Written by Marc Ostwald, ADMISI’s Global Strategist & Chief Economist
The Week Ahead – Preview:
- Tech tariff relief likely to be short lived, as China Trade and Credit Aggregates, Singapore GDP and MAS policy easing are digested; NY Fed Expectations, corporate earnings and Fed speakers ahead
- China: export surge not a great surprise in context of tariff wars, softer than expected imports both a function of weak domestic demand and disruption to Brazil sot exports
- Week Ahead: China and US activity data, UK jobs and inflation, ECB and BOC rate decisions, slew of corporate earnings and miners’ production reports to vie with overarching trade war theme
- Charts/Tables: China Commodities Trade; Fed custody holdings of Treasuries; VIX vs MOVE volatility indices; EUR and JPY vs. USD long-term charts
- Free Live Commodities People Webinar – “Supply Chain Uncertainty: The Impact of US Tariffs on Global Trade”//** 16 April | 3PM BST / 10AM EDT – Spots are limited register here: Click here
The new week may be holiday shortened, but there is a busy run of major activity data from the US and China, inflation and labour market indicators in the UK; ECB, Bank of Canada, Singapore MAS and Turkey TCMB policy decisions, BoE and ECB bank lending surveys, a speech by IMF chief Georgieva on the global outlook ahead of the Spring IMF/World Bank meetings, more Q1 corporate earnings, OPEC and IEA oil market reports all vying to contend with the overriding theme of US tariff wars, above all the impasse with China, and for this week the meeting between Trump and Italian PM Meloni. Friday’s carveout of phones, computers and semiconductors from US reciprocal tariffs (for details see: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.govdelivery.com%2Fbulletins%2Fgd%2FUSDHSCBP-3db9e55%3Fwgt_ref%3DUSDHSCBP_WIDGET_2&data=05%7C02%7CSimrat.Sounthe%40admisi.com%7Cee786379414944e9c5bb08dd7b2f1692%7C2f55bf3242d444b3a8c2930ac8b182b2%7C0%7C0%7C638802164980435147%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2olob1aeAJuD23TRILtDNR4QgNCxrNfrx06WIfjERSs%3D&reserved=0) was but the latest example of the ‘cold hard light of day’ forcing another change or reversal (of which there will be more), which in the greater scheme of things add more to uncertainty and a sense of paralysis for real economy businesses, than offering any material relief. Indeed it is likely that a new, though lower, tariff on these goods will likely be announced in short order. Informed sources also suggest this week may also see the much feared and extremely disruptive imposition of the $500K to $1.5 Mln in port fees for Chinese made ships. For all that some may argue that this to-ing and fro-ing is / was all part of the ‘plan’ of the new US administration for maximum disruption, it is still de facto very disorderly, and makes the US appear to be a very unreliable partner in political and business terms (in other words failing to learn any lessons from Brexit). Seen from a bigger picture perspective, even if many if not all of the tariffs are rolled back in the not too distant future, there will be no return to the post Bretton Woods II world order of mass financialization and globalization or the ‘great moderation’. The problem is that if one throws a bomb into a complex and massively interdependent global economic operating system, every model that assumes stability (in continuity and geopolitical terms), cohesion and coherence has effectively been incinerated. For the US (or any other) administration to assume it can impose an order on the aftermath is the ultimate act of hubris in the face of actual anarchy. To be sure, a reordering of the global financial system that should have happened in the wake of the ‘global financial crisis’ (above all in terms of the complete dislocation of the financial system from the ‘real’ economy, or in US terms: Wall Street and Main Street), and which was made all the more imperative and pressing by the unprecedented fiscal and monetary policy measures deployed to combat the Covid pandemic, has long been overdue. But how the dust settles after this fire storm is written in the stars that are no longer visible, and the risk that this disorder morphs into military conflict are very high. Resilience, adaptability, and agility are the watchwords in terms of risk management, and this also puts an even greater imperative on strengthening existing business relationships. Volatility is now baked in the cake, and while many continue to focus on the VIX, they should perhaps be a lot more attentive to the fact that the MOVE US Treasury volatility index has never settled back into its (much lower) pre-pandemic range, which cannot just be blamed on the sharp rate hike and more modest rate cut cycle – see attached chart.
Be that as it may, this week’s highlights by country:
– U.S.A.: Following another set of rather alarming Michigan Sentiment Inflation Expectations on Friday, the latest equivalent NY Fed survey is due on Monday, with the February survey having seen a modest upward shift in the 1-yr measure to 3.13% from 3.0%. A further moderate increase looks to be a certainty, but anything more than 20 bps would likely set off some alarm bells on the FOMC, even if in the very short-term it is going to be more focussed on whether it will have to deploy unconventional tools (i.e. not rates) to restore some calm to the money and Treasury markets. Tuesday has the final leg of inflation data for March via way of Import Prices, with a drop in oil prices expected to keep headline flat m/m, while the risks look to be to the downside of the forecast +0.3% m/m on the ex-Petroleum measure, given anecdotal evidence that exporters to the US were cutting prices to shift inventories ahead of tariffs. Headline Retail Sales should get a big boost from the jump in Auto Sales, with the consensus looking for 1.4% m/m, while ex-Autos sales are seen up 0.4% m/m, and the core ‘Control Group’ measure 0.6% m/m, boosted by some bigger ticket goods spending, also trying to beat tariffs, though restaurant sales may prove to be weak, and therefore imply a sharp drop in Q1 Personal Consumption GDP to 1.0% or less vs. 4.0% in Q4. Weak Manufacturing surveys and lower oil sector output predicate a forecast of -0.2% m/m in Industrial Production, with Manufacturing Output seen up 0.3% after a jump of 0.9% m/m in February. The week also has the first of the April regional Fed manufacturing surveys, with the unreliable and volatile NY survey seen at -12.5 from -20.0, and the Philly Fed measure is expected to drop to 3.0 from 12.5, while the NAHB Housing Market Index is forecast to edge down 1 pt to 38, and Housing Starts to see a reactive correction of -5.2% m/m after surging 11.2% in February (after storm and wildfire related disruption in January). Expect a good deal of unusual attention to the TIC Portfolio Flows data, above all to China’s holdings of Treasuries, though beware the potential for a lot of hyperbole about whether or not China is ‘dumping’ Treasuries in response to US tariffs.
– China: With the US and China mired in a brutal war on tariffs, the weekend credit aggregates offered some hope that stimulus measures are starting to get some traction, with New Yuan Loans jumping CNY 3.6 Trln against forecasts of CNY 2.96 Trln, and Aggregate Social Financing surging a whopping CNY 5.9 Trln against forecasts for a CNY 4.93 Trln rise. Still a closer look at the borrowing data highlights that Corporate borrowing was only slightly above the average for the past 5 years, and Household lending slightly below. Monday’s Trade data are expected to see a 4.6% y/y rebound from a LNY timing effect paced drop of 3.0% y/y in February, though Imports are seen down -2.1% y/y (vs. Feb +1.5%). All of which is well and good, but the focus is on the likely hefty impact of the massive escalation in the tariff wars with the US in April. Wednesday brings Q1 GDP and March activity indicators, with GDP forecast to slow somewhat to 1.4% q/q from 1.6%, which would see y/y slip to 5.2% from 5.4%. Monthly data are expected to be relatively solid with Industrial Production holding at a robust 5.9% y.t.d. y/y, but Retail Sales still sluggish on a historical basis, though accelerating to 4.3% y.t.d. y/y from 4.0%, with Fixed Asset Investment holding at 4.1%. Property sector indicators will likely remain desultory, with Investment barely changed at -9.7% y/y, and Sales likely to have slipped from a base effect flattered -0.4% y.t.d last month, with an open question on whether New and Used Home Prices can finally post a m/m rise after falling in every month since June and May 2023 respectively. But as these are all backward looking, the focus remains on which of the US and China are going to blink first on trade negotiations.
– Eurozone: Outside of Germany’s ZEW survey & PPI and final Eurozone CPI, the statistical calendar is bare. Unsurprisingly given equity and bond market turmoil, ZEW Expectations are expected to collapse to 10.0 from March’s 51.6, though Current Conditions are forecast to be little changed at a woe begotten -86.8. So all eyes will be on Tuesday’s ECB Q1 Bank Lending survey, expected to see lending conditions continuing to stabilize after 2 years of improvement, and Thursday’s ECB rate decision. While the hawks may argue that stable lending conditions suggest policy does not need to be eased further, they will likely find themselves in a minority, not only given the downside risks to the growth outlook due to tariff wars, but above all the sharp appreciation in the EUR (which as per attached chart has broken out of a 17 year downtrend) implying disinflationary pressures, along with the implied tightening in financial conditions from a steep rise in bond yields. While sticking to a narrative of the rate trajectory being largely determined on a meeting by meeting basis, it will likely signal some further scope for rates to fall by describing downside risks to the growth outlook as having risen, though noting enormous outlook uncertainty due to the evolution of trade wars.
– U.K.: The sharp push back on BoE rate expectations due to the much better than expected GDP data looks misplaced, but these are reactive markets, and the upward pressure on long-term rates worldwide is also playing a part. This week brings BRC Retail Sales with the like for like measure seen slipping further to a tepid 0.6%, after dropping from 2.5% to 0.9% February. Tuesday’s labour data are expected to paint a mixed picture on labour demand with HMRC Payrolls seen dropping -15K after two unexpected though modest increases, while the discredited LFS Employment is expected to pick up to 170K from 144K, this despite a sharp rise in the jobseeker numbers seen in the REC/KPMG survey, and a relatively sharp 44.1K jump in the Claimant Count in February. But rate expectations will be more sensitive to Average Weekly Earnings and Wednesday’s CPI, with the former forecast to see headline edging 0.1 ppt lower to 5.7%, but the ex-Bonus measure edging up by the same amount to 6.0%. Wednesday’s CPI is something of a non-starter given the sharp increases in Utility bills, Council Tax and other administered prices at the start of April, and unlikely to stir much reaction if forecasts of a 0.4% m/m rise in headline that would see the y/y rate dip 0.1 ppt to 2.7%, with core and Services also seen dipping to 3.4% y/y and 4.8% y/y respectively. Thursday’s BoE Q1 Bank Liabilities and Credit Conditions will be of some interest given the rise in longer-term yields, and the impact on both mortgage and SME business lending.
– Canada: Tuesday’s CPI may be quite decisive for Wednesday’s BoC rate decision, with the mid-February end of sales tax holiday likely to be the key driver of an expected 0.7% m/m rise, edging up both the headline and core CPI y/y rates by 0.1 ppt to 2.7% and 3.0% respectively. The BoC will however be watching the trend in discretionary goods and services prices not impacted by the sales tax fluctuations, which may exercise more downward pressure than expected (particularly travel services), and this may be just enough to tip the balance in favour of another rate cut, though a small majority of surveyed economists look for the BoC to hold rates at 2.75%, also in part dictated by the proximity of the April 28 general election.
– Elsewhere India’s CPI is forecast to ease modestly to 3.5% from 3.6% y/y, primarily on the back of lower fresh food prices, per se leaving average CPI comfortably below the RBI’s 4.0% target, and by extension opening the door to a further 25 bps rate cut. In Japan, Friday’s National CPI is seen echoing Tokyo CPI with headline unchanged at a lofty 3.7% y/y, but core measures continuing their upward march to 3.2% y/y ex-Fresh Food and 2.9% ex-Fresh Food & Energy. While this would certainly add to the case for a further rate hike, Ueda & Co have made it abundantly clear that they are in ‘wait and see’ mode for the next couple of months due to the array of uncertainties around the global economic outlook, and likely also keeping a wary eye on the JPY as it threatens to breach a long-term support trendline – see chart.
– In the commodities space, oil prices will continue to be closely watched, and it will be interesting to see how the monthly Oil Market Reports from OPEC and IEA contrast in terms of the supply and demand outlooks, particularly the intended OPEC+ increase in production. There are a number of conferences including China New Energy and Aluminium Expos, and the LNG and Hydrogen events in Budapest. For metals the focus will be on Alcoa’s earnings, as well as Q1 production reports from Antofagasta, BHP, Rio Tinto and Vale. This week’s monthly S&D reports include US NOPA’s soybean crush, and Sugar reports from Brazil’s CONAB and Unica. Last but not least, the WTO has the very thankless task of updating its Global Trade Forecasts. while the EU publishes its State of the Climate report.
– There are 31 S&P 500 companies reporting this week, with worldwide corporate earnings highlights as compiled by Bloomberg News likely to include: ABB, Abbott Laboratories, American Express, ASML Holding, Bank of America, Blackstone, Charles Schwab, China Unicom Hong Kong, Citigroup, CATL Contemporary Amperex Technology, CSX, DR Horton, Goldman Sachs, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology, Heineken, Infosys, Interactive Brokers, Johnson & Johnson, M&T Bank, Marsh & McLennan, Netflix, Nordea Bank, Ping An Bank, PNC Financial Services, Progressive, Prologis, TSMC Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Travelers, Truist Financial, UnitedHealth, US Bancorp, Wanhua Chemical, Wipro.
To view the full report and to sign up for daily market commentary please email admisi@admisi.com
The information within this publication has been compiled for general purposes only. Although every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information, ADM Investor Services International Limited (ADMISI) assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions and will not update it. The views in this publication reflect solely those of the authors and not necessarily those of ADMISI or its affiliated institutions. This publication and information herein should not be considered investment advice nor an offer to sell or an invitation to invest in any products mentioned by ADMISI.
© 2025 ADM Investor Services International Limited.
Risk Warning: Investments in Equities, Contracts for Difference (CFDs) in any instrument, Futures, Options, Derivatives and Foreign Exchange can fluctuate in value. Investors should therefore be aware that they may not realise the initial amount invested and may incur additional liabilities. These investments may be subject to above average financial risk of loss. Investors should consider their financial circumstances, investment experience and if it is appropriate to invest. If necessary, seek independent financial advice.
ADM Investor Services International Limited, registered in England No. 2547805, is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority [FRN 148474] and is a member of the London Stock Exchange. Registered office: 3rd Floor, The Minster Building, 21 Mincing Lane, London EC3R 7AG.
A subsidiary of Archer Daniels Midland Company.
© 2021 ADM Investor Services International Limited.
Futures and options trading involve significant risk of loss and may not be suitable for everyone. Therefore, carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. The information and comments contained herein is provided by ADMIS and in no way should be construed to be information provided by ADM. The author of this report did not have a financial interest in any of the contracts discussed in this report at the time the report was prepared. The information provided is designed to assist in your analysis and evaluation of the futures and options markets. However, any decisions you may make to buy, sell or hold a futures or options position on such research are entirely your own and not in any way deemed to be endorsed by or attributed to ADMIS. Copyright ADM Investor Services, Inc.